[Top] [All Lists]


To: riscy@pyramid.com
Subject: Re: IDE/UART
From: Andreas Busse <andy@piggy.waldorf-gmbh.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 93 07:36:15 GMT
Reply-to: riscy@pyramid.com
Sender: riscy-request@pyramid.com
> [...]
> I'm not opposed to an ISA expansion bus.  Design is an art of
> compromise and trade-offs.  If there is room on the board and in the
> budget for an expansion bus, that's great.  But if most of the
> _function_ of the expansion bus can be accomodated by this 100-pin
> quad flat pack and a 22V10 and a bus buffer, then it's not
> _such_a_disaster_ if there's not room for the expansion bus, or
> perhaps only one expansion socket.

I did *not* made the suggestion to use that Super I/O thing because
I like to skip the ISA bus. I suggested it because we *definitly*
need UARTS, and we have some good reasons (floppy boot) to have a FDC
on board. Well, that chip has additional parallel and IDE interfaces.
That's nice. Nothing more.

> I'm trying to imagine who are the people who are going to use this
> thing, and how are they going to use it.  My _guess_ is that the
> people who want to do data acquisition will use a commercial PC, and
> probably commercial software, for that.  On the other hand, various
> sound cards or MIDI interfaces are probably something that would
> interest the second wave of 'riscy owners' (the pioneers will be
> pleased to get the thing to send and receive mail).

Yes, sending mail is even for me more important than MIDI, but,
you won't believe it, that thing has *free* programmable baud rates
from XX to 115k. Baudrate is set by a 16bit timer for each UART,
so even the MIDI baudrate shouldn't be a problem. You just have to
add the opto-isolators! 


Andreas Busse             | e-mail: andy@piggy.waldorf-gmbh.de (home)
Eislebenstrasse 5         |         andy@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de (office)
D-5300 Bonn 1             | Phone:  +49 (0)228-252687


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>