[Top] [All Lists]

Re: cost of fpu? EISA?

To: mackinla@cs.curtin.edu.au (Patrick Mackinlay)
Subject: Re: cost of fpu? EISA?
From: Stephen Siu-ming Wong <a080700@hp750a.csc.cuhk.hk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 93 10:05:19 HKT
Cc: riscy@pyramid.com
In-reply-to: <199306250132.AA23532@vincent.cs.curtin.edu.au>; from "Patrick Mackinlay" at Jun 25, 93 9:32 am
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.30]
Hi Risciers,

>>      79R3051E-20     $79     (non-FPU, 4k I-cache, 8k D-cache)
>>      79R3051E-40     $155    (non-FPU, 4k I-cache, 8k D-cache)
>>      79R3081E-40     $297    (FPU, 8k I-cache, 16k D-cache)
>This is a bit late, but I believe the cache sizes above are wrong. As
>far as I'm aware, the '51 has 4k i-cache + 2k d-cache. The '52 has 8k
>i-cache + 2k d-cache. The '81 I'm not so sure about, but I suspect it's
>16k i-cache + 8k d-cache, not as indicated above. Anyone have a book
>with the '81 spec?
>I suspect there's not much of a price difference between the '51 and
>the '52 either - perhaps we'd do well by going for the '52 when the
>time comes? As Steve mentioned, we don't really have to worry about
>this yet anyhow...

Do you guys and gals have benchmark results for '51, '52, and '81?  As
long as all the above CPUs are pin compatible (really?) why should we
argue the choice of CPU?  We can make a board without CPU and everyone
can put in his/her affordable CPU on the board!  Any other special
issue for this setup despite we have to deal with floating point
emulator in software if the hardware doesn't have one?

I think we have to decide (are we already said 40MHz?) the CPU clock
frequency and go on to other tricky part, such as ISA bus, ethernet,
video, etc.

v Stephen Wong Siu-ming    v internet: stephenwong@cuhk.hk  v
^ Computer Services Center ^ bitnet  : a080700@cucsc.bitnet ^
* Chinese University of    * phone   : (852) 609-8904       *
v Hong Kong                v fax     : (852) 603-5001       v


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>