linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] kill devm_ioremap_nocache

To: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] kill devm_ioremap_nocache
From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 09:34:25 +0800
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ysxie@foxmail.com>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>, <richard@nod.at>, <marek.vasut@gmail.com>, <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <wim@iguana.be>, <linux@roeck-us.net>, <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>, <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <jason@lakedaemon.net>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>, <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, <industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, <wg@grandegger.com>, <mkl@pengutronix.de>, <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <mchehab@kernel.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <a.zummo@towertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>, <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>, <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, <seanpaul@chromium.org>, <airlied@linux.ie>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>, <dvhart@infradead.org>, <andy@infradead.org>, <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>, <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <vinod.koul@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>, <jslaby@suse.com>
In-reply-to: <b8ff7f17-7f2c-f220-9833-7ae5bd7343d5@c-s.fr>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1514026525-32538-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> <20171223134831.GB10103@kroah.com> <b8ff7f17-7f2c-f220-9833-7ae5bd7343d5@c-s.fr>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0

On 2017/12/24 17:05, christophe leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 23/12/2017 à 14:48, Greg KH a écrit :
>> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 06:55:25PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> When I tried to use devm_ioremap function and review related code, I found
>>> devm_ioremap and devm_ioremap_nocache is almost the same with each other,
>>> except one use ioremap while the other use ioremap_nocache.
>>
>> For all arches?  Really?  Look at MIPS, and x86, they have different
>> functions.
>>
>>> While ioremap's
>>> default function is ioremap_nocache, so devm_ioremap_nocache also have the
>>> same function with devm_ioremap, which can just be killed to reduce the size
>>> of devres.o(from 20304 bytes to 18992 bytes in my compile environment).
>>>
>>> I have posted two versions, which use macro instead of function for
>>> devm_ioremap_nocache[1] or devm_ioremap[2]. And Greg suggest me to kill
>>> devm_ioremap_nocache for no need to keep a macro around for the duplicate
>>> thing. So here comes v3 and please help to review.
>>
>> I don't think this can be done, what am I missing?  These functions are
>> not identical, sorry for missing that before.
> 
> devm_ioremap() and devm_ioremap_nocache() are quite similar, both use 
> devm_ioremap_release() for the release, why not just defining:
> 
> static void __iomem *__devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t 
> offset,
>                resource_size_t size, bool nocache)
> {
> [...]
>     if (nocache)
>         addr = ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
>     else
>         addr = ioremap(offset, size);
> [...]
> }
> 
> then in include/linux/io.h
> 
> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t 
> offset,
>                resource_size_t size)
> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, false);}
> 
> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_nocache(struct device *dev, 
> resource_size_t offset,
>                    resource_size_t size);
> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, true);}

Yeah, this seems good to me, right now we have devm_ioremap, devm_ioremap_wc, 
devm_ioremap_nocache
May be we can use an enum like:
typedef enum {
        DEVM_IOREMAP = 0,
        DEVM_IOREMAP_NOCACHE,
        DEVM_IOREMAP_WC,
} devm_ioremap_type;

static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t 
offset,
                resource_size_t size)
 {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, DEVM_IOREMAP);}

 static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_nocache(struct device *dev, 
resource_size_t offset,
                    resource_size_t size);
 {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, DEVM_IOREMAP_NOCACHE);}

 static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_wc(struct device *dev, 
resource_size_t offset,
                    resource_size_t size);
 {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, DEVM_IOREMAP_WC);}

 static void __iomem *__devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
                resource_size_t size, devm_ioremap_type type)
 {
     void __iomem **ptr, *addr = NULL;
 [...]
     switch (type){
     case DEVM_IOREMAP:
         addr = ioremap(offset, size);
         break;
     case DEVM_IOREMAP_NOCACHE:
         addr = ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
         break;
     case DEVM_IOREMAP_WC:
         addr = ioremap_wc(offset, size);
         break;
     }
 [...]
 }

Thanks
Yisheng

> 
> Christophe
> 
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> ---
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le 
> logiciel antivirus Avast.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> .
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>