linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] pinctrl: Add Microsemi Ocelot SoC driver

To: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] pinctrl: Add Microsemi Ocelot SoC driver
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:53:25 +0100
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Linux MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mOquwnKxR3ZFVYjXadbhKIIjqLzqPIA1PsJxuxe2G3U=; b=ETW9zwkGTD/cFKiJWf95tVscVvGto3SgQJn/EY8pGzzfOeR1lVMHLfpek2NlExh9or npGavhP2EhWRL273ZYXmRmsE9HiJ326GENfmX2rd1gZCIKwkc3wAr9s/eKzPB7jQ4Wxz 0K1DW/yJ3ilcIC1263rLUFdTzuLtxxQZ2K3No=
In-reply-to: <CAOFm3uF_OjqK0cQ1A4Xkp8kZab+afqPsnF5rB9=a7Dym9jiU4w@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20171208154618.20105-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20171208154618.20105-6-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <CACRpkdZ=+pFZYteq=wM=z-CGejY+dX_SqhtDbbGBn+q60arQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOFm3uF_OjqK0cQ1A4Xkp8kZab+afqPsnF5rB9=a7Dym9jiU4w@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Philippe Ombredanne
<pombredanne@nexb.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
>>
>> Wow never saw that before. OK I guess.
>
> That's the new thing. Less legalese boilerplate, and more code for the
> better IMHO.
>
> You can check the doc patches from Thomas for details [1]
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934

Yeah I'm aware of this part, but I didn't see that combined license
before.

What is the reason for not just using GPL 2 here?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>