linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions.

To: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions.
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:20:08 -0800
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gBVDLxPii85D7S6Zw0FnxUVEFPpJ2OSEPy4tduJQhIc=; b=fQAbhbejE65eg1fYZnfjqaF7+wMXRsY6116E2BbBobyDS4iJpWtdhffSBkkvzdKPL6 6D+WTMLa/mUA+IP76PsMH72uwJv/LnM+tuda2wCVhGixiHiTk+x2mG8LXqU9uJLxz0/J vQyxtF0bJdMrOMxh54jKk7V24G2pVJYlBOpgt35p53kinn9bVLdXkBMFP/01AgtY9pRs meuJDYFmbtIEcUveYsKBMho/jQNSU9saH9XDGdMffMic45kyK34mG0GKw9QPYehBcOO0 ++PUX7WQXmlMj1UI1J8lBfXCG2RDig685uUdDRSI8VmWCWENEmCdpCaUKXHOywIFUlWn aloA==
In-reply-to: <54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1424996199-21366-1-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> <1424996199-21366-2-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> <54EFBF9D.4020004@gmail.com> <54EFE6B9.1050109@imgtec.com> <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com> <54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
On 02/27/2015 11:04 AM, Steven J. Hill wrote:
On 02/27/2015 11:52 AM, David Daney wrote:

I think there is still misunderstanding.

Your patches leave us with definitions for *both* _PAGE_READ *and*
_PAGE_NO_READ defined in the source code.  My suggestion was to
eliminate all vestiges of _PAGE_READ and _PAGE_READ_SHIFT, and unify
all variants to use _PAGE_NO_READ

Okay, I see what you are after. I think it is worth doing, but I would
really like to get XPA into 4.0 along with this patch as it is. I will

4.0 seems to be long gone with respect to adding new features, although Ralf would obviously make the final decision.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>