linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: [PATCH V7 3/8] MIPS: Cleanup Loongson-2F's gpio driver

To: 陈华才 <chenhc@lemote.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V7 3/8] MIPS: Cleanup Loongson-2F's gpio driver
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:48:14 +0900
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>, "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>, linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>, Zhangjin Wu <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/FEiy9Ovx/TqLFF3rqSHGruB+TvEi1kCQr0CQA4DmNA=; b=E5gHXB8R5DvKu67HY8pJwFvmoZOS49Ge9X2cvkqPlFGAZ7mA4/49njO/muSLd5KiDf ds4a4BdZckDN1KNlS2zCdwu0GHR7aCK11KcVvJStBhGTb3qRbI0XuWKPS1d4VplegAkj tAtMl73gNiahovw3NXrMQ1k4z2hM0XS9oViXeakAlLJb+9fTRlFyjU08Gm/591KzyMht r3KtF3o9EkQ7XS1CpT53hZiESa7lA+TUcg72WKe938tiPkXRx5s9WFuGwpn9+FT8JHD+ d/gM06sAEubxwgj8BZrV5+3K/3rv/blaJhEh22kvpH80kyfSRpb3+/E+bVIFeP2rXXjn RFpA==
In-reply-to: <tencent_5337E0085A0993E56C99045F@qq.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <tencent_5337E0085A0993E56C99045F@qq.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:35 PM, 陈华才 <chenhc@lemote.com> wrote:
> I have tested, could I add myself?

No. :) But it's good to know that you have tested, too many patches
get submitted without care.

What I would like to get is an ack from a MIPS maintainer so we can
move this code away from that architecture

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>