linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Display CPU byteorder in /proc/cpuinfo

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Display CPU byteorder in /proc/cpuinfo
From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:16:40 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1423714613; bh=GRpSXh1EiNhj5lL61wmG1ldwTPT7Dg8SRdoAxiTdhfg=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=aZHDSwUNUTG22xYsanga4mGWwuTPE3PGwM8ovYXRAYs+XlkPtd9IjrhRIjEKvaVCm pPq2R2Yi8KF7YOQpZxBB775Q33GN0eGxKhSZvIziD1e5SFhw6/ThywcFmWDrzLc7Q1 CGk2vpXrYQ573YkkWXYzbpWMsNNssKu9jeNvnTwPI0sEK7nq04YbIqic/dzOLPIKdt RCsgosGolxArwUBSGXfQLOhOh9s6MC+U0Ebu+RXKK+LPE+fH4r12EtEoBc4/56cjFA 8jJOgkMpDB7GWHNP3BxDwdRgJSo49E0NBbvgLE2ey+uVRmiZvBxoRqXb0tIJq7WH5g 5n1RCT9OgzV4w==
In-reply-to: <54BCC827.3020806@gentoo.org>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <54BCC827.3020806@gentoo.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
On 01/19/2015 04:02, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
> 
> This is a small patch to display the CPU byteorder that the kernel was 
> compiled
> with in /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/proc.c |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> This patch has been submitted several times prior over the years (I think), 
> but
> I don't recall what, if any, objections there were to it.
> 

[much discussion later]
[snip]

So I assume final consensus is this patch (v1 or v2) isn't acceptable to
reintroduce this feature?  If so, I'll mark it as such in patchwork and just
continue to carry it locally in Gentoo's patchset.

-- 
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
kumba@gentoo.org
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28

"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us.  And our
lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."

--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>