linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

watchdog: SOC_MT7621?

To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: watchdog: SOC_MT7621?
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:13:29 +0100
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
John Crispin's commit 576c618cf659 ("watchdog: add MT7621 watchdog
support") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next 20150204). I
noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem
with it.

That commit adds an (optional) dependency on the Kconfig symbol
SOC_MT7621. But there's no symbol SOC_MT7621 in linux-next yet.

(Note that there currently are two checks for CONFIG_SOC_MT7621 in
arch/mips/ralink/early_printk.c. I mentioned these checks in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/27/218 and in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/12/302 . John never replied to these
messages. Since I haven't received replies on other, more serious issues
in over three months I assume John has disappeared.)

Is SOC_MT7621 still being worked on?


Paul Bolle


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>