|To:||Aaro Koskinen <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: octeon-ethernet: don't assume that CPU 0 is special|
|From:||David Daney <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:08:31 -0700|
|Cc:||<email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, David Daney <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <email@example.com>|
|List-software:||Ecartis version 1.0.0|
|References:||<firstname.lastname@example.org> <5249B37E.email@example.com> <20130930193502.GE4572@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> <5249D407.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20130930195642.GF4572@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7|
On 09/30/2013 12:56 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi, On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:41:59PM -0700, David Daney wrote:On 09/30/2013 12:35 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:No, the original logic was already broken. The code assumed that the NAPI scheduled by the driver init gets executed always on CPU 0. The IRQ got enabled just because we are lucky.No. The default affinity for all irqs is CPU0 for just this reason. So there was no luck involved.According the Kconfig, this driver can be compiled as a module:config OCTEON_ETHERNET tristate "Cavium Networks Octeon Ethernet support"[...]To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. The module will be called octeon-ethernet.What guarantees that CPU0 is around (or the smp_affinity is at its default value) by the time user executes modprobe?
Nothing enforced by the kernel. Just don't take CPU0 off-line and you should be good to go.
There is a lot of room for improvement in the driver.Really this whole thing of starting NAPI on multiple CPUs for the same input queue is not good. It leads to loss of packet ordering when forwarding.
What we really want is to have one POW group (input queue) per CPU and only run one CPU per group. If we did that, we wouldn't have all these affinity issues.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: octeon-ethernet: don't assume that CPU 0 is special, Aaro Koskinen|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: octeon-ethernet: don't assume that CPU 0 is special, Aaro Koskinen|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: octeon-ethernet: don't assume that CPU 0 is special, Aaro Koskinen|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: octeon-ethernet: don't assume that CPU 0 is special, Aaro Koskinen|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|