On 05/06/12 23:19, Steven J. Hill wrote:
> From: "Steven J. Hill" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Make headers consistent across the files and make changes based on
> running the checkpatch script.
i dont see any checkpatch related changes
> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <email@example.com>
> arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c b/arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c
> index aa9da9e..56470c6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c
> @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> - * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
> - * by the Free Software Foundation.
> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
> + * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
> + * for more details.
The change in License is not related to the Subject / commit message.
Why do you change the license in the first place ? the code was GPLv2
and after your change it only GPL ?
NAK on this one ...
> * Copyright (C) 2010 John Crispin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 MIPS Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Does a include fixup justify a Copyright holder change ?
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> -#include <asm/time.h>
> +#include <linux/time.h>
> #include <asm/fw/fw.h>
> #include <lantiq.h>