[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] PCI: Pass available resources into pci_create_bus()

To: Bjorn Helgaas <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] PCI: Pass available resources into pci_create_bus()
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:56:15 +0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zGQc2KuIiC4ZBnR5hhOkw84GQVo6BIvi1B8nV1K6TkA=; b=LM5GamP9+lLopoOhoQ2z7X5y4cAFq5Jmu4TvvjpyGFzNaLrEjVC7zHwp2oqEuux0WN Ly037LBfvQQB/WO0yMy53cpRCIvwDuI+BnTfepSuIQ/dIcrBhfKBEryAUVq8ews/OfoD 5pRbEaYMoK3vwB3i3LJrJMoEanBYN4frN7888=
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <>
2011/8/24 Bjorn Helgaas <>:
> I like this approach a lot.  Thanks for working it up.  It's a nice
> small change with very little impact to other architectures, and you
> have a nice clear changelog.  You might mention something about the
> fact that by default, the bus starts out with all of ioport_resource
> and iomem_resource -- that will mean something to people who know how
> host bridges work.

Thanks! And I'll add this info to the patch description.

> Using pci_bus_add_resource() here *seems* like it should be the right
> thing, but I don't think it will work correctly.
> The problem is that struct pci_bus has both a table of resources
> (bus->resource[]) *and* a list (bus->resources).
> pci_bus_add_resource() always puts the new resource on the list, but
> various arch code still references the table directly, e.g., sparc has
> "pbus->resource[0] = &pbm->io_space" in pcibios_fixup_bus().
> As written, I think this patch will break sparc because the host
> bridge will end up with both pbm->io_space (in the table) and
> ioport_resource (in the list).

Good catch! I overlooked this point.

> I think something like this would work, though:
>    if (bus_res)
>        list_add_tail(&b->resources, &bus_res->list);
>    else {
>        b->resource[0] = &ioport_resource;
>        b->resource[1] = &iomem_resource;
>    }

Yes, it should work.

Thanks again for your time,


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>