[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] MIPS: move mipsxx pmu helper functions to P

To: David Daney <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] MIPS: move mipsxx pmu helper functions to Perf-events
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 11:12:21 +0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=a7svlzV1ShvVTzzrpCEM8jkmbEJAXAAMlH0uJa7BOWk=; b=GRv4ayMAB4rgcp/vU1i09sTeKV67T0/yO/VscKw7rakHcQfUuzKA/UfzcxRmxthwvl NZRqT7+2e5RgyQ/9Od8XVoZc8wGbO++Q0gjPmexJv+W9h608svrFiSYvncrff+jIDhpK r/wAU4b8gCHoOEUdNMJeWfkRVjYeLQ7hxA0dQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bsbPw/gNxxF645Jpa/bjTECOH3NHamkpklmDNgg3bCCaIjbwVzfyV/KHCSF4V+iUlT kgL4aVt+SCFUhfmleGSCYxH58oLd9ZpZicEaxBOLQ0VwI/7IgPS27kNj018fGBjyhNQG 1qL5CwH5z2dI89Zps3M/nZztUpnzPg078xdfo=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
2010/5/28 David Daney <>:
> Is is possible to fold this patch also?  I don't think we need to follow the
> exact evolution of the new files.
[DC]: Patches 1~7 are the primary implementation for MIPS Perf-events. And
patches 8~12 make Oprofile use Perf-events as backend. By doing this, 1~7
can be reviewed/applied/built/tested independently. Maybe you are referring
to Patchwork, so the [00/12] is not visible, here is the link:


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>