[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system

To: Ralf Baechle <>
Subject: Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system
From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 11:58:29 -0700
Cc: Shane McDonald <>,
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default;; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WPK27LMTCp/yrI9KeJ2UB1/OwONMj2e12OX4Ld0XHOUEi3+KRRoCvu9uhNyjP4WhUlrZxHkTS2QL/e3JpcVZCBPSFrZQVe+nBjX0Ce72LBUO0Mab0OpVUNmTD4umZWNI;
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <E1O8lDn-0000Sk-86@localhost> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20100317)
Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:

What we used to use was what I *thought* was an old public domain
program whose name was an English word that had something to do with
being exacting.  Googling with obvious keywords didn't turn it up.

Is it paranoia by any chance?  Paranoia is available as single files at:

It's ages that soembody last ran it but last known status is that there
were no paranoia fault.
Yes, that's it! I used to run it all the time when I was working on SMTC FPU support. Shane, does it work on your system with the emulator??


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>