[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system

To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>
Subject: Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system
From: Shane McDonald <>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 01:13:20 -0600
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kgd/EWwl8vrQ42caOEectcX3bw7K21iGvt6Pd/kgBg0=; b=pu3c/fWXlvnRGAOe7b1+6gXHPK5fHaNsW4qzEClubgpNWIG3EXVOWVIaSZN8fCYsr+ TAITcZb1YJYJWr/IN61e5CVUSqP9J5UXOhpsMtWBXhGm/mWGGvvShaIGO3tmkwetJTap 8E67g1/tDmkpFzHrCd80qZc+P4Imrr/nhkHzA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GztCAWYP73n77ENIcKwkvbFmXfYO9iN8AdBq02TmctcCKbzNXqX/L37J6SEQEp7tIc ADa2U3GEpBUzDdg2XMLcri0XIiurJ1vbAvXF+n69bqvvVYPu+ZZmu0KhphVGSMbFeY3R JauJ4QDs+SYhfMouVE345380FSvThwgVSch5I=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <E1O8lDn-0000Sk-86@localhost> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sorry to the list for all the noise...

One final data point:

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Shane McDonald
<> wrote:
> When I'm inside my handler, I see the FCSR register has the value 0x8420,

On a machine with an FPU, when I'm inside the handler, the FCSR register
seems to have the value 0x400 (no Causes or Flags bits set),
rather than the 0x8420 that the FP emulator has.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>