On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:42, Dominic <email@example.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your precious reply! I try to use -static to compile
> the program, then the 64-bit program can run, so it should be the
> library related other than 64-bit instruction or addressing related.
> Then I stored the 64-bit libraries in nfs, and mount it on the target
> board, after adding the path to ld.so.conf and 'ldconfig', the program
> compiled without -static still does not run. Shall I miss something?
`ldd <your_program>' may tell you...
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Jan Rovins <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Jian Wang wrote:
>>> I have a 64-bit mips cpu, and compiled a 64-bit application, but this
>>> application could not run. (the target is running Linux)
>>> The details is:
>>> 1)if I compile the application with -mabi=n64, this program could not
>>> run, when I run it in the shell, it prompts "command not found"
>>> 2)but if I compile the application with -mabi=n32, it runs well and
>>> gives the correct result.
>>> I am wondering why with "-mabi=n64", this program could not run? I
>>> checked the CP0(status register), Bit px=0b0, KX=0b1, SX=0b1, UX=0b1,
>>> it seems that in User Mode, it accepts 64-bit operation.
>>> Anybody could give me some help? Any comments is much appreciated!!
>> Perhaps you do not have the "n64" system libraries set up correctly in
>> I have seen the "command not found" error when some fundamental libraries or
>> the loader was missing.
>> Do you have a /lib64 & /user/lib64?
>> Run the file command on some of those libraries & see if they are n64 or n32
>> double check your ld.so.conf to make sure it points to every thing you need.
>> re run ldconfig if you change something.
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- email@example.com
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds