[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: implement hardware perf event support

To: "dengcheng.zhu" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: implement hardware perf event support
From: Wu Zhangjin <>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:04:21 +0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6E/y1khOdL382TV8UDb67NDew8WYJGgp2hHBeZak2rQ=; b=QAIEgqaFacMkr6l98WkN3OJluAweBx+pNz1KIVLvmjXnE5G9AoZ7KbrKsyNkpuKw08 4YPK6jpFATsYiF0FOo627EE8r4loMdMvqddbFpcYhyt0nZxGNORTHZ4m5O9tMm20/65c dUNBRnljmNv9ulaXObmbqW9yY6H33Nfm5LPY4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=DoVkXSXXJ61KEq/KHfoDtNESxj0ShptoEdHs48wHwAbxBB5uMcc7F/cEu6mhcQaSJi YGerOPpHjXox70/1+47DvcgYgi56asVNRkUdZnHnnTh4ZZo1mT1fQhw3yFk9BviSYQVN za3lGYXkQSmQlxK51lkJ2YTYUPMYw08Pj5iOg=
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: DSLab, Lanzhou University, China
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <1271349557.7467.424.camel@fun-lab> <1271353636.20625.99.camel@falcon> <>
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 09:49 +0800, dengcheng.zhu wrote:
> >
> > I think it will not work on rm9000 and loongson2 for their performance
> > counters are different from mipsxx. so suggest you only enable this for
> > mipsxxx(refer to arch/mips/oprofile/Makefile) via #ifdef and renaming
> > the current perf_event.c to perf_event_mipsxx.c.
> OK, I'll try to move the control/count help functions/defines and the
> specific mips_pmu stuff into a file called perf_event_mipsxx.c, and leave
> the common things in perf_event.c, so that when we implement Perf for
> loongson2 or rm9000, we can simply add new files like
> perf_event_loongson2.c.
> > And to reduce the source code duplication, perhaps we need a solution to
> > share the source code between Oprofile and Perf, and also among mipsxx,
> > rm9000 and loongson2.
> I think there is almost nothing for the count/control things which can be
> shared among mipsxx/rm9000/loongson2. As for sharing between Oprofile and
> Perf, how about moving mipsxx/rm9000/loongson2 count/control things into a
> new file asm/pmu.h, where we use #ifdef's.

It looks good, based on your work, I will try to add the loongson2
specific perf support, then we can get more details about the common

        Wu Zhangjin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>