[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH -v6 08/13] tracing: add IRQENTRY_EXIT section for MIPS

To: Wu Zhangjin <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 08/13] tracing: add IRQENTRY_EXIT section for MIPS
From: Frederic Weisbecker <>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:36:50 +0100
Cc:,,, Thomas Gleixner <>, Ralf Baechle <>, Richard Sandiford <>, Nicholas Mc Guire <>, David Daney <>, Adam Nemet <>, Patrik Kluba <>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VYKYmXNBA3y19ntzeFa0sjdAonwVh69pgf7ICAU0HaM=; b=HdvZbsJTy4EsMAMyQ04Jqxpi0jbihDlqwvqXtvwSxxOayzRcDpie8ovYsliXKg9d8h TJzGufweiU3pBa21H5F7tQOGOJUHvI+KvGvDi9FTDm0OyzJRd6zFTFMxC3mwDV7cXBPi bvX6i2NL2Y/hrzgE4ZL4NPAyJ8bND9vu0lDO0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sDUJtzhK4VnQ6UO3hRWq7V14CclNuV1bU+0IbJW9BzjlXYfQycX2qEnnKstzLL61OA Nuj2rlzYnNnbmoHdQxXpccKG9ErYU9oEQpMUaN/E0ev34nxbZerzReQAiEfWiEP9pAav +0sCs1LemkuCaBHvt3i5fYUZiL8w2yTGCLauw=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <20091109022640.GC13153@nowhere> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:31:08AM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> Who should I resend this patchset to? you or Steven? If this patchset
> are okay, I will rebase it on the latest tracing/core branch of -tip and
> send the latest version out, and hope you can apply it, otherwise, I
> need to rebase it to the future mainline versions again and again ;) and
> at least, I have tested all of them and their combinations on YeeLoong
> netbook, they work well. of course, more testing report from the other
> MIPS developers are welcome ;)
> Regards,
>       Wu Zhangjin

You can keep the current Cc list so that we are all uptodate with the
latest state. I don't think you need to rebase against latest tracing/core
as there doesn't seem to be conflicatble changes inside added lately.
The person who is likely to apply it is Steven as he can test it :)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>