[Top] [All Lists]

[RFC] i2c-designware patches

Subject: [RFC] i2c-designware patches
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:44:04 +0900
Original-recipient: rfc822;
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)
Hi Baruch and lists,

Here're various improvements / bug-fixing patches for DW I2C driver.
I'm working with v2.6.27-based kernel, but they must work fine with the
latest mainline kernel.

It's stil in RFC, and I'm working with it for some time.  Any comments
or suggestions are highly appreciated.  Then I'll respin and give it a
test, thanks.

Baruch, I'd say the base driver is in good shape enogh, so I'm having
a fun with modifing the driver.  Thanks for the initial work.

P.S. ARM and MIPS lists are Cc:ed as I believe there must be potential
users of this driver.

Shinya Kuribayashi (16):
     i2c-designware: Consolidate to use 32-bit word accesses
     i2c-designware: Don't use the IC_CLR_INTR register to clear interrupts
     i2c-designware: Use platform_get_irq helper
     i2c-designware: i2c_dw_read: Take "struct dw_i2c_dev" pointer
     i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Take "struct dw_i2c_dev" pointer
     i2c-designware: Remove an useless local variable "num"
     i2c-designware: Set a clock name to DesignWare I2C clock source
     i2c-designware: Improve _HCNT/_LCNT calculation
     i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Fix an i2c_msg search bug
     i2c-designware: Do dw_i2c_pump_msg's jobs in the interrutp handler
     i2c-designware: Set Tx/Rx FIFO threshold levels
     i2c-designware: Divide i2c_dw_xfer_msg into two functions
     i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" pointer
     i2c-designware: Deferred FIFO-data-counting variables initialization
     i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Mark as completed on an error
     i2c-designware: Add I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_* bits

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c |  367 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)

Shinya Kuribayashi
NEC Electronics

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>