|To:||"Joseph S. Myers" <email@example.com>, Ralf Baechle <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API|
|From:||David Daney <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:37:14 -0700|
|Cc:||"Maciej W. Rozycki" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <email@example.com>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 22.214.171.124 (X11/20090320)|
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:Hello,Here is code to implement the getcontext API for MIPS. This glibc patch is sent to the linux-mips mailing list, because it makes use of an internal syscall which has not been designated as a part of the public ABI. I am writing to request this syscall to become fixed as a part of the ABI or to seek for an alternative. See below for the rationale.Was there any conclusion about whether the assumptions this patch makes about the kernel are OK (and so it can go in) or not?
My (unofficial) conclusion is that this should be part of the kernel's public ABI, and that you should commit the glibc patch. However, Ralf should probably weigh in the subject so we can know this definitively.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Crazy idea: run linux on a mips-based photo frame, Adilson Oliveira|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH] ftrace porting of linux-2.6.29 for mips, Wu Zhangjin|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API, Joseph S. Myers|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API, Ralf Baechle|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|