[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc

To: Kumba <>,, Linux MIPS List <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:04:16 +0000
In-reply-to: <87myggilk2.fsf@firetop.home>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <87abcjibsl.fsf@firetop.home> <> <87tzargrn4.fsf@firetop.home> <> <87prleh2hc.fsf@firetop.home> <> <87myggilk2.fsf@firetop.home>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:47:25PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> >> Actually, I meant: I was wondering about the fact that there seems
> >> to be no online copy of the errata sheet that describes this problem.
> >> I've only ever seen a description of the workaround.  I've never seen
> >> a verbatim copy of the errata itself.
> >
> > I tried seeing whether had anything old off of the
> > site, but nothing close to the old directory structure seems
> > to exist.  If I new what the PDF file name was, it might be possible
> > to track something down on Google pertaining to the last publicly
> > released revision.  Bit surprised, too, on why NEC doesn't have
> > anything on  They produced the actual silicon and had a
> > hand in designing it, if I'm not mistaken.  I'd think they would at
> > least have a copy if no one else.
> Yeah.  Maybe they just want to erase bad memories ;)

The R10000 processor is not a MIPS Technologies but SGI product.  So
you've been looking at the wrong site.  However to shorten your search,
only some of the relativly early versions of the errata sheets were


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>