[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] mips: Add dma_mmap_coherent()

To: James Bottomley <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: Add dma_mmap_coherent()
From: Takashi Iwai <>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:19:40 +0200
Cc:,, Parisc List <>
In-reply-to: <1219255088.3258.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <1219249633.3258.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1219255088.3258.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.2 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
At Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:58:08 -0500,
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 18:53 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > I'm afraid there are several problems.  The first is that it doesn't do
> > > what you want.  You can't map a coherent page to userspace (which is at
> > > a non congruent address on parisc) and still expect it to be
> > > coherent ... there's going to have to be fiddling with the page table
> > > caches to make sure coherency isn't destroyed by aliasing effects
> > 
> > Hmm...  how bad would be the coherency with such a simple mmap method?
> > In most cases, we don't need the "perfect" coherency.  Usually one
> > process mmaps the whole buffer and keep reading/writing.  There is
> > another use case (sharing the mmapped buffer by multiple processes),
> > but this can be disabled if we know it's not feasible beforehand.
> Unfortunately, the incoherency is between the user and the kernel.
> That's where the aliasing effects occur, so realistically, even though
> you've mapped coherent memory to the user, the coherency of that memory
> is only device <-> kernel.  When the any single user space process
> writes to it, the device won't see the write unless the user issues a
> flush.

I see.  In the case of ALSA mmap mode, a user issues an ioctl to
notify after the read/write access, so it'd be relatively easy to add
a sync operation.

Does the call of dma_sync_*_for_device() suffice for that purpose?

(BTW, how does the fb driver work on this?)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>