|To:||Ralf Baechle <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject:||Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace|
|From:||"Chris Friesen" <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:35:58 -0600|
|User-agent:||Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513)|
Ralf Baechle wrote:
$LBB378 is an internal symbol. The value of RA may not be very informative if it was overwritten by a random subroutine call.
What determines which function names get compiled into the object file, and which ones get these numerical symbols?
You may also try lockdep; it gives much more detailed information though it's more heavyweight.
I would love to be able to use lockdep...however I'm stuck on an old kernel. Chris
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: fix problem with vr41xx_cpu_wait, Ralf Baechle|
|Next by Date:||Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, David Daney|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, Ralf Baechle|
|Next by Thread:||Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, David Daney|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|