|To:||Sergei Shtylyov <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH 2/2] Pb1200: do register SMC 91C111|
|From:||Sergei Shtylyov <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:16:08 +0400|
|Organization:||MontaVista Software Inc.|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803|
Hello, I wrote:
Pb1200 does have SMC 91C111 Ethernet chip on board but the platform code did not register it, so one couldn't mount NFS...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <email@example.com>
--- This is definitely a bad place for the board #ifdef's, so I'm going to submit a patch moving IDE and 91C111 registration into arch/mips/au1000/pb1200/...
Err, Ralf, since these 2 patches haven't got merged and haven't got into 2.6.25 anyway, maybe it makes sense to ignore them, so that I do these change along with moving the code into arch/mips/au1000/pb1200/platform.c?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [MIPS] Fix handling of trap and breakpoint instructions, Ralf Baechle|
|Next by Date:||[Patch 0/6] MIPS Hardware watchpoint support for gdb., David Daney|
|Previous by Thread:||[PATCH 2/2] Pb1200: do register SMC 91C111, Sergei Shtylyov|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH 2/2] Pb1200: do register SMC 91C111, Ralf Baechle|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|