[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] IP28 support

To: Kumba <>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED PATCH] IP28 support
From: (Thomas Bogendoerfer)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:39:38 +0100
Cc: Ralf Baechle <>,
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 01:16:13AM -0500, Kumba wrote:
> I've been out of it lately -- did the gcc side of things ever make it in, 
> or do we need to go push on that some more?

We need push on that. Looking at

there seems to be a missing understanding, why the cache
barriers are needed. I guess the patch could be improved
by pointing directly to the errata section of the R10k
user manual. Or even better copy the text out of the user
manual. That should make clear why this patch is needed.

Peter did you do the copyright assigment ? That's probably
the second part, which needs to be done.


Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>