On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Shane McDonald wrote:
> The following are not "just pure junk", as PMC-Sierra is working on
> providing acceptable code that supports their MSP71xx processors.
> Patches to remove these are not required!
> On 7/11/07, Robert P. J. Day <email@example.com> wrote:
> > ========== PMCTWILED ==========
> > arch/mips/configs/msp71xx_defconfig:941:CONFIG_PMCTWILED=y
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_hwbutton.c:35:#ifdef CONFIG_PMCTWILED
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_hwbutton.c:85:#ifdef CONFIG_PMCTWILED
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_hwbutton.c:97:#ifdef CONFIG_PMCTWILED
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_setup.c:249:#ifdef CONFIG_PMCTWILED
> > ========== SQUASHFS ==========
> > arch/mips/configs/msp71xx_defconfig:1307:CONFIG_SQUASHFS=y
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_prom.c:46:#ifdef CONFIG_SQUASHFS
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_prom.c:552:#ifdef CONFIG_SQUASHFS
> > arch/mips/pmc-sierra/msp71xx/msp_prom.c:554: /* Get SQUASHFS
> > size */
i never *claimed* that they were junk, i was *asking* what was junk
since, typically, there's little value in testing preprocessor
variables if they aren't defined in a Kconfig file somewhere. and if
something is not defined in a Kconfig file, it's generally a bad
choice to name it with a "CONFIG_" prefix.
in addition, i'm not sure what's going on with that SQUASHFS test,
since squashfs is not part of the kernel source tree, so what you're
testing for there is a mystery.
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA