[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SGI O2 meth: missing sysfs device symlink

To: Kumba <>
Subject: Re: SGI O2 meth: missing sysfs device symlink
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:37:42 +0100
Cc: Martin Michlmayr <>,, Giuseppe Sacco <>
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <1178743456.15447.41.camel@scarafaggio> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:51:30PM -0400, Kumba wrote:

> Didn't test on 2.6.22 (yet), but works:

That's the only one I care about for purposes of upstream patch submission

> Btw, If we wanted to protect meth from the speculative execution issues of 
> the R10000 processor, what's the right way for that?  I believe IP28 used a 
> special type of buffer for protecting Seeq from the DMA wonkiness that 
> occurs, but I got the indication that Meth would need a different approach.

I don't see why the standard approach would fail for meth.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>