[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about signal syscalls !

To: "David Daney" <>
Subject: Re: Question about signal syscalls !
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:55:56 +0100
Cc: "Ralf Baechle" <>, linux-mips <>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nfb8DKdEYRncnV4ht3h3MG22TzrbqpBznfJSA+qYmhxOCxn2ily4ZY6KNzj/zVhE5usKZ5YqXdS/Jrlvfw1YIfIqe4W4afu3Re/QjZXGAJIDMWPLy+X7/mNOEmgMgQimbQ5kc71iSXewfxId1Li7sHXmPwOrgjVRs+4kOXa4niQ=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <>
On 2/1/07, David Daney <> wrote:
I don't think *any* registers *need* to be saved on sys_sigreturn().
The values in sigcontext on the user stack associated with the system
call are all used instead of the actual register values.

Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Could you explain ?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>