[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix

Subject: Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
From: Atsushi Nemoto <>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:31:20 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:20:15 +0000 (GMT), "Maciej W. Rozycki" 
<> wrote:
> > if CONFIG_64BITS and ${load-y} in CKSEG0
> >    cflags-y += -msym32
> > endif
> > 
> > what do you think ?
>  I do not see enough of justification for -msym32 to be forced.  This will 
> also raise the minimum version of binutils required to 2.16 for the 
> affected platforms, which may be a little bit too aggressive.

Well, $(call cc-option,-msym32) can be used safely.  AFAIK -msym32 was
added to gcc 4.0 which was released on Apr 2005, and binutils 2.16 was
release on May 2005.  So if gcc accepted -msym32 we can assume
binutils accept too.

I think killing BUILD_ELF64 and adding -msym32 automatically are good
idea.  Also I do not think __pa_page_offset() is critical for

Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>