[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <>
Subject: Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:06:44 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UTWwr7qVzA//Fkw7I98lElC4TW82CbAbgR7isMY75OB+w8ripAjP8NvxulQy0jgoAIgn8276FlTW/Vohsyb+ZbBMdoRYroXTapdOzXhg6vlnzbmTtf6E1WkDOzCfsPfep9TGjcqM34HjtNee/fgPI0BBaWnQtjqqT1cZBHBjDSQ=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <>
On 12/1/06, Atsushi Nemoto <> wrote:
No, there are irq chips still need __do_IRQ().  Please grep

If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler,
GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good.  But we have i8259...

That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config
default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ()
anymore, well I think...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>