On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:58:02AM +0900, girish wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:58:02 +0900
> Subject: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-4)
> From: girish <email@example.com>
> To: Atsushi Nemoto <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> CC: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> girish <email@example.com>
> Content-type: multipart/mixed;
> > Using just plain text and adding Signed-off-by line would be preferred.
> > Also your patch seems against neither latest lmo nor kernel.org tree...
> The kernel sources I was referring to were 2.6.17-rc6.
> >> In the meantime, I couldn't find the changes suggested for SPARSEMEM
> >> support
> >> in the main source tree. Especially the ones reviewed during month of
> >> August
> >> ([PATCH] do not count pages in holes with sparsemem ...). Could you please
> >> resend the consolidated patch to the list? Thanks.
> > August? I sent the patch with that title in July and applied already.
> > http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=239367b4
> Again, I was referring to older sources, that is 2.6.17-rc6. I have just
> upgraded reference sources to 2.6.18 as mentioned above & now I see the
> changes. Thanks. In fact I am experimenting on highmem/sparsemem with
> 126.96.36.199 kernel sources.
> Please find attached patch created from 2.6.18 (kernel.org) tree. Let me
> know if this is alright.
> Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- if (low < max_dma)
+ if (low < max_dma) }
This doesn't quite compile.