[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] fast path for rdhwr emulation for TLS

To: Atsushi Nemoto <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fast path for rdhwr emulation for TLS
From: Nigel Stephens <>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:39:08 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: MIPS Technologies
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20060501)
moto wrote:
>> BTW, if the fast emulation can't handle rdhwr in a delay slot, please
>> report a bug on GCC asking it not to put rdhwr in delay slots by
>> default.  It's probably worthwhile.
> If rdhwr was on a delay slot, the slow emulation will be more slower.
> So I think rdhwr should not be put on delay slot anyway regardless
> fast emulation.
> I asked on GCC bugzilla a few days ago but can not got feedback yet.

In spite of the GCC issue, is this patch now at the point where it could
be applied, or at least queued?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>