[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Added MIPS RM9K watchdog driver

To: "Randy.Dunlap" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added MIPS RM9K watchdog driver
From: Roland Dreier <>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:27:55 -0700
Authentication-results:;; dkim=pass ( sig from verified; );
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <>, Thomas Koeller <>, Dave Jones <>,,, Ralf Baechle <>,
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=556; t=1155572876; x=1156436876; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;;; z=From:Roland=20Dreier=20<> |Subject:Re=3A=20[PATCH]=20Added=20MIPS=20RM9K=20watchdog=20driver;; b=kaChd09ajgwZIFxkDB0Vs8wDYvpE651jDSyXilf0p8oeLRz4MboKJgur5mmlPMPBXPZg8ZtO DBhZ2Ba//fd7uFFw/6Ny5yrpJT+pmgrOurZX3jRglLt6uPWZtMWIn+1H;
In-reply-to: <> (Randy Dunlap's message of "Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:21:24 -0700")
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux)
    Randy> Sure, autoconf.h is included, but I think his point is that
    Randy> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT may not be defined there at all,
    Randy> as in my 2.6.18-rc4 autoconf.h file, since my .config file
    Randy> says: # CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT is not set

Huh?  How would including <linux/config.h> help with that?  And why
would you want CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT to be defined if
WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT is not set in your configuration?  That would
utterly break code that does something like


 - R.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>