[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis

To: Thiemo Seufer <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis
From: David Daney <>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:27:42 -0700
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <>,,
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929)
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
David Daney wrote:

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

Instead of dump all possible address in the stack, unwind the stack
frame based on prologue code analysis, as like as get_chan() does.
While the code analysis might fail for some reason, there is a new
kernel option "raw_show_trace" to disable this feature.

Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <>

Let me start by saying I have not analyzed how all this code works, but I have done something similar in user space.

Since the kernel ABI does not use gp, many functions may not have a prolog (especially when compiled with newer versions of GCC). In the user space case, most leaf functions have no prolog. For the kernel I would imagine that many non-leaf functions (simple non-leaf functions that do only a tail call) would also not have a prolog.

Non-leaves have to save/restore $31 somewhere, so there should be a

OK, good point.

But there is still the leaf function problem.

David Daney.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>