|To:||Daniel Mack <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] AU1100 I2C support|
|From:||Sergei Shtylyov <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:31:32 +0400|
|Cc:||email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com|
|Organization:||MontaVista Software Inc.|
|References:||<20060719180204.GK25330@enneenne.com> <20060722091342.GA22158@ipxXXXXX> <20060722123243.GA4543@gundam.enneenne.com> <133FC0BA-B375-46D4-916E-773996425F57@caiaq.de>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803|
Hello. Daniel Mack wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:13:42AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
Is there any reason why it is limited to this very processor and should not work with all au1xxx types?
To be honest I don't know exacly... I don't know so well other processors in this family. However I think at least au1000 and au1200 should be compatible.
I think so, too. Since you only call the generic au_* functions for the GPIO access, all members of this processor family should be supported. I propose to change the patch accordingly.
Actually, Au1550/1200 have dedicated SMBus contoller and an existing I2C driver for it, so there''s probably no need for another bit-banging driver for them.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH] AU1100 I2C support, Rodolfo Giometti|
|Next by Date:||Multiple page size support for AU1xxx, hemanth.venkatesh|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH] AU1100 I2C support, Rodolfo Giometti|
|Next by Thread:||Re: Overview-writing BSP, Ashlesha Shintre|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|