[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] local_r4k_flush_cache_page fix

Subject: Re: [PATCH] local_r4k_flush_cache_page fix
From: Atsushi Nemoto <>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:37:46 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:31:54 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto 
>>>>> <> said:

anemo> BTW, I wonder if current code (with or without this patch)
anemo> works properly for physically indexed cache.  Though I do not
anemo> know if there were physically indexed icache, there are
anemo> certainly physically indexed dcache (ex. MIPS 20KC).

anemo> For those physically indexed caches, we should use 'pfn'
anemo> argument passed to flush_cache_page ?

I'm thinking of introducing MIPS_CACHE_PINDEX and 'cpu_has_pindex_dcache'.

I guess secondary cache is also physically indexed.  Is there any
virtually indexed secondary cache ?

Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>