[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Add 4KSx support (try 2)

To: Ralf Baechle <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add 4KSx support (try 2)
From: Franck <>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:21:33 +0100
Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>,
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hUzyNx1AcICMPK1xDuYzilMgR9NWhXSfltgwR62IXgqL15ZZ5Dy2WJSutT1wab7QhquqNdtRcsNYuMCIkL8gYrMGjFEoWTSLwSK9ykgNAAVqgGVgLsTnorwXekoR/6kykplh5GCmSN5Dw2rrVyJm0xdh05RQjURXn/4oT3WunU8=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
2005/10/31, Ralf Baechle <>:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:08:50AM +0100, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> > Have you thought about what the ACX state would mean for
> > kernel debuggers in general and kgdb in particular?

should I add support of smartmips extension in kgdb ?

> The real issue I have with the patch is that ACX is extending the state
> that would need to be saved and restored in signal handlers and I have to
> solve the question where to keep that information without breaking
> compatibility - that's pretty much the same exercise which we had just
> recently with adding DSP support.

could you explain more on this point ?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>