[Top] [All Lists]

Re: preempt_schedule_irq missing from mfinfo[]?

To: Atsushi Nemoto <>
Subject: Re: preempt_schedule_irq missing from mfinfo[]?
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:01:38 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:29:12PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> >>>>> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:03:09 +0100, Ralf Baechle <> 
> >>>>> said:
> ralf> If the WCHAN column of ps axl is supposed to be any useful we
> ralf> need to unwind the stack until we find the caller of the
> ralf> sleeping or scheduling function.  Very useful for debugging.
> Yes, but many sleeping/scheduling (such as schedule_timeout(),
> __down(), etc.)  are compiled without -fno-omit-frame-pointer, so
> you can not find the caller of such functions anyway.

Without additional information a framepointer isn't terribly useful on
MIPS.  Unfortunately it's stored at a non-constant offset in a function's

> And some sleeping/scheduling functions which are compiled with
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer are static or deprecated (sleep_on(), etc.)
> You can find the caller of "schedule()" even with simple
> thread_saved_pc().  I think it is enough so I do not think it is worth
> to fix (and maintain) current minfo[].

The alternative would be to finally bite the bullet and add a wchan field
to thread_struct and initialize it in all the sleeping functions.

The IA-64 people have something like a DWARF-based frame unwinder but
that just seems to heavy.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>