I find this message,
Thank you for reply.
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:53:02PM +0900, Tatsuya Koseki wrote:
> > Subject: kernel 2.6.9 patch
> > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:53:02 +0900
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-2022-jp"
> > Please review
> > --- linux/include/asm/stackframe.h.old Tue Dec 14 17:49:38 2004
> > +++ linux/include/asm/stackframe.h Tue Dec 14 17:50:35 2004
> > @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@
> > nor v1, $0, v1
> > and v0, v1
> > or v0, a0
> > +
> > + li v1,2
> > + or v0,v1
> > +
> > mtc0 v0, CP0_STATUS
> > LONG_L v1, PT_EPC(sp)
> > MTC0 v1, CP0_EPC
> o Your patch got corrupted by using a differnet indentation so couldn't be
> applied anyway
> o When posting a patch, post an explanation. If the purpose of a patch
> isn't obvious it'll likely be ignroed.
> o This bug was already fixed in CVS.
> o The issue only affected new-born processes, so there is no reason to
> burden the fix on every exception taken.
> o Why using two instruction if one would be sufficient.