On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:53:02PM +0900, Tatsuya Koseki wrote:
> Subject: kernel 2.6.9 patch
> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:53:02 +0900
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> Please review
> --- linux/include/asm/stackframe.h.old Tue Dec 14 17:49:38 2004
> +++ linux/include/asm/stackframe.h Tue Dec 14 17:50:35 2004
> @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@
> nor v1, $0, v1
> and v0, v1
> or v0, a0
> + li v1,2
> + or v0,v1
> mtc0 v0, CP0_STATUS
> LONG_L v1, PT_EPC(sp)
> MTC0 v1, CP0_EPC
o Your patch got corrupted by using a differnet indentation so couldn't be
o When posting a patch, post an explanation. If the purpose of a patch
isn't obvious it'll likely be ignroed.
o This bug was already fixed in CVS.
o The issue only affected new-born processes, so there is no reason to
burden the fix on every exception taken.
o Why using two instruction if one would be sufficient.