[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Ocelot-3 memory configuration patch

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ocelot-3 memory configuration patch
From: Michael Stickel <>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:06:14 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <>
User-agent: KMail/1.7
What if the "memsize" PMON variable is not defined?
Can that happen. Then the memory size is either 0L,
or an undefined value.
Shouldn't it be initialized to 128 by default?

On Tuesday 07 December 2004 01:35, you wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
> Based on your suggestion, I have now modified the Ocelot-3 code
> to probe for memory that has been configured by PMON. Please review ...
> Thanks
> Manish Lachwani

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>