[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
Cc:,,, Ralf Baechle <>, Richard Sandiford <>
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <mailpost.1090246948.15046@news-sj1-1> <>
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 wrote:

> At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:22:29 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> > (this has led to an address shift enlarging the
> > patch significantly, unfortunately).
> maybe add nops to pad, instead?

 Well, addresses have been shifted down, so you'd have to remove 
something.  I suppose the break tests could be moved to the end of file, 
but I fail to see an advantage.  Test cases that embed addresses in output 
patterns are doomed to suffer from such changes.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>