[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?

To: Brian Murphy <>
Subject: Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:31:54 +0200
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <>,
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote:

> Not sure what you mean. I get the panic "Break instruction in kernel 
> code" from do_bp
> in traps.c. This seems like a strange "assertion" to me...

The more information BUG or BUG_ON provide the bigger the kernel gets.
Using a simple break instruction was simply the smallest thing.  The
previous, just slightly more verbose BUG() implementation did result
in ~ 87k of bloat ...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>