[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp

To: Dominic Sweetman <>
Subject: Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:51:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: Ralf Baechle <>, Adam Kiepul <>, Fuxin Zhang <>,
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: Technical University of Gdansk
Original-recipient: rfc822;

> I think it would be better to provide cache manipulation calls defined
> top-down (by their purpose); but so long as we are stuck with calls
> which are defined as performing particular low-level actions, it's
> surely dangerous to guess that we know what they are used for so we
> can trim the functions accordingly...

 The API is not cast in stone -- if there's a justifiable benefit,
appropriate fuctions can be added; either completely new ones (possibly
inlined) or as an extension to cacheflush() (which still has 30 bits
freely available). 


+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+        e-mail:, PGP key available        +

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>