[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CVS linux

To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>
Subject: Re: CVS linux
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:44:50 +0200
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>,
In-reply-to: <02a701c34f81$4f32ca50$10eca8c0@grendel>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <02a701c34f81$4f32ca50$10eca8c0@grendel>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:12:07PM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:

> >  Any justifiable reason for getting rid of arch/mips64?
> In my opinion, it should never have existed.  The vast majority
> of MIPS-specific kernel code can be identical for 32-bit and 64-bit
> versions of the architecture.  Creating arch/mips64 (as opposed
> to arch/mips/mips64 or Ralf's arch/mips/mm-64) caused duplication 
> of modules that then needed to be maintained in parallel - but which 
> often were not.

In retroperspective it was a good think to start with and allowed us to
do some of the really intrusive change necessary without disturbing
the 32-bit stuff.  Now that things are settling down it's time to cleanup.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>