Michael Guo suggested add_wired_entry -- I'm giving that a try now. I'm
trying to stick to "the kernel that we trust" (from the perspective here)
because I'm worried about what I end up breaking trying to take a new
I am behind the time, though, so I'll try to test out 2.4.21-pre4 when I get
back (I'm not available to run the tests during the rest of this week).
From: Pete Popov [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Joseph Chiu
Cc: Linux MIPS mailing list
Subject: RE: wired tlb entry?
Any chance you can try 2.4.21-pre4 (latest linux-mips) before we go any
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 11:12, Joseph Chiu wrote:
> (Sorry for the double-send of the original inquiry to the list -- I
> got bounce notices from my mailer...)
> This is the kernel from almost a year ago with the changes you made to
> support the 36-bit phys addr. access on the Au1xxx.
> The Au1x00 PCMCIA (CS release 3.1.22) initialization maps phys_mem
> to virt_io c0000000.
> I am running HostAP (0.0.3) on top of this PCMCIA support, using a
> Prism3-based WiFi card.
> During transmit/receive activity, the hardware interrupt invokes the
> prism2_interrupt() in hostap_cs.o which, in turn reads and writes from
> registers using the virtual i/o address of c0000000.
> Under light and moderate loading, there are no problems. After heavy
> traffic loads, the system eventually dies with accesses to address
> (one address gets hit 95% of the time - and there were other addresses a
> other times, but always in the c000xxxx address range).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Popov [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:19 AM
> To: Joseph Chiu
> Cc: Linux MIPS mailing list
> Subject: Re: wired tlb entry?
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 17:36, Joseph Chiu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is there a (proper) way to add a page entry in the TLB it's always
> > Specifically, accesses to memory-mapped hardware (PCMCIA) causes the
> > to oops under heavy interrupt loading.
> > It seems to me that the page entry in the TLB is getting flushed out
> > the activity; and when the ioremap'd memory region is accesses, the
> > exception handling for the missing translation does not run.
> > I'm afraid my two days of googling hasn't turned up the right
> > I think I just don't know the right terminology and I hope someone can
> > least point me in the right direction.
> > Thanks.
> > Joseph
> > (I am running 2.4.18-mips)
> So is this a kernel from linux-mips.org? Are you using the 36 bit I/O
> patch in that kernel, or the pseudo-address translation hack that I
> removed later? What pcmcia I/O card are you using and what tests are you