To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Vr41xx unaligned access update |
From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
Date: | Fri, 23 May 2003 16:59:43 +0200 (MET DST) |
Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.21.0305231618590.26586-100000@vervain.sonytel.be> |
Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hmm, what tree is it against? I can't see code matching these hunks in > > our tree at linux-mips.org. > > Check out the 2.4.x branch. I did verify that all patches apply. Being much surprised I've double checked this before replying, both a nightly snapshot at my local system here and directly at ftp.linux-mips.org. I'm using a branch tagged as "linux_2_4". AFAIK, it is *the* 2.4 branch. And AFAIK, it is the only branch that is actively maintained these days. Also I recall the discussion on the BD issue on these chips once, but I can't recall any results of it going into the CVS. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Vr41xx unaligned access update, Geert Uytterhoeven |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Vr41xx unaligned access update, Geert Uytterhoeven |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Vr41xx unaligned access update, Geert Uytterhoeven |
Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Vr41xx unaligned access update, Geert Uytterhoeven |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |