[Top] [All Lists]

Re: -mcpu vs. binutils

Subject: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils
From: Guido Guenther <>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 00:22:15 +0200
In-reply-to: <>
Mail-followup-to: Guido Guenther <>,
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <> <20030513201144.GY3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:50:21PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> I just had a look at the gcc sources, the mips*-linux config doesn't
> support o64 at all.
It seems I was wrong (I got confused by the way the kernel calls gcc).
Looking at gcc-3.3:

#define ABI_32  0
#define ABI_N32 1
#define ABI_64  2
#define ABI_EABI 3
#define ABI_O64  4

The naming is very "unfortunate", though. We have (n32,64) and (32,o64).
Wouldn't it help to at least allow for n64 and o32 commandline options?
-mabi=32 and -mabi=64 will have to be kept for Irix compatibility
though, I think.
 -- Guido

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>