[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sigset_t32 broken?

To: Geert Uytterhoeven <>
Subject: Re: sigset_t32 broken?
From: Juan Quintela <>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:30:15 +0100
Cc: Vivien Chappelier <>, Ralf Baechle <>, Linux/MIPS Development <>
In-reply-to: <> (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:19:26 +0100 (MET)")
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090012 (Oort Gnus v0.12) Emacs/21.2.92 (i386-mandrake-linux-gnu)
>>>>> "geert" == Geert Uytterhoeven <> writes:

geert> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Vivien Chappelier wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> > Most of what your patch does is undoing an accidental commit of a signal
>> > rework that wasn't yet supposed to go out.
>> Maybe.. but current version is still wrong :) The type of the sig
>> array in the 32-bit compatibility struct sigset_t32 must be 32bit long,
>> i.e. unsigned int not unsigned long.
>> And I think unsigned describes the data better than signed, but that's a
>> matter of taste :) (coherent with the choice in asm-mips/signal.h).

geert> Why not make it u32?

Nahh, that will make it clear indeed to stupid's like me :p

Later ,Juan.

In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>