On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Vivien Chappelier wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > Most of what your patch does is undoing an accidental commit of a signal
> > rework that wasn't yet supposed to go out.
> Maybe.. but current version is still wrong :) The type of the sig
> array in the 32-bit compatibility struct sigset_t32 must be 32bit long,
> i.e. unsigned int not unsigned long.
> And I think unsigned describes the data better than signed, but that's a
> matter of taste :) (coherent with the choice in asm-mips/signal.h).
Why not make it u32?
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- email@example.com
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds