On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:38:49PM +0200, Hartvig Ekner wrote:
> H . J . Lu writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:55:14PM +0200, Hartvig Ekner wrote:
> > > Hi H.J,
> > >
> > > No, I did not compile myself, but used your binary (except for cracklib,
> > > where I used our natively compiled package instead). But I did replace
> > > ALL new updated packages at once during the upgrade.
> > >
> > > However, I have also tried to install (-U) rpm*rpm and the popt rpm on a
> > > working system based on your original packages, and voila: the same error
> > > appears. So it does appear to be linked to the rpm RPM package.
> > >
> > > The grep you asked for returns:
> > Thanks. I will fix those among other bugs I have been working on.
> Great, thanks. Can you let me know as soon as the RPM problem has been fixed,
> so that I can continue the update of the installation images? BTW, are the
> other bugs you're working on something to wait for in this regard or not?
I updated glibc, python, gcc, gdb, rpm, openssl, binutils and toolchain at
Let know know if there are any problems.